Ring Cycle for the 21st Century – “Die Walküre”

After the premiere of Robert Lepage’s dull production of the first installment of Wagner’s four-opera “Ring Cycle”, Das Rheingold (also reviewed on this blog), I was skeptical that the production’s main set piece – a 24-plank machine that can be arranged into a limitless number of configurations – could support the theatrical requirements of the longer operas in the cycle. But after I attended Die Walküre, the second opera in the cycle, on April 25, my concerns proved to be unfounded. The use of the set, the direction, and the singing were many times superior to the fall production of Rheingold, and I was reassured that the production has the potential to conjure up the many magical realms of the remaining two operas.

The "Die Walküre" banner on the Met façade

Although the title character is the Valkyrie Brünnhilde, Bryn Terfel as the god Wotan was the star of the performance. As opposed to his rather flat portrayal of the character in Das Rheingold, Mr. Terfel presented an informed characterization both vocally and dramatically. Mr. Terfel sang dynamically and ranged from practically whispering at the beginning of his Act Two narrative (a very effective touch) to singing forcefully with controlled power. Although resembling Mad-Eye Moody from Harry Potter, he displayed the many aspects of Wotan’s personality, and his acting evoked both an arrogant god and deeply emotional father.

As Brünnhilde, soprano Deborah Voigt was not as impressive. Although moving in the role’s lyrical moments, her top notes – especially during her “Hojotoho” – lacked clarity and sounded a bit forced. Fortunately, she improved considerably over the course of the evening, and the final scene between Brünnhilde and Wotan was quite touching. Ms. Voigt’s major strength was her acting. The production represents Brünnhilde as a rambunctious warrior-maiden and Ms. Voigt was very convincing as Wotan’s impetuous daughter.

Jonas Kaufmann as the half-human, half-god Siegmund dominated the first act with his huge sound and strong presence. Mr. Kaufman has a hefty tenor which seemed out-of-place when he sang Cavaradossi in last season’s presentation of Puccini’s Tosca. However, Mr. Kaufmann’s voice is much better suited for the Wagner heldentenor roles, and he was excellent as Siegmund. An especially astounding moment of the performance came during his cries for his father: “Wälse! Wälse!”. Mr. Kaufmann sustained both high notes for a seemingly inhuman duration of time, yet he never seemed to strain.

The set of "Die Walküre" before the opera begins

As his sister and later wife Sieglinde, Eva-Maria Westbroek (still recovering from recent illness) was a committed actress, but had a slight wobble in her singing – most noticeably in the top notes. Also, on one occasion, she lost connection with the orchestra and raced through one of the most important phrases of the opera, “O hehrstes Wunder!” – the introduction of the “Redemption through Love” theme.

Stephanie Blythe as the goddess Fricka – although appearing as if out of a 1950’s sci-fi film – brought much to her relatively short time onstage. Ms. Blythe sang with her characteristically clear, powerful mezzo and performed incredibly as usual. Moreover, she was able to portray Fricka’s anger without sounding like a nag and elicited justifiable sympathy from the audience.

As the boorish Hunding, German bass Hans-Peter König sang with a booming voice and acted with commanding stage presence. The Valkyries, Brünnhilde’s eight warrior sisters, were sung by a mixture of talented sopranos and mezzo-sopranos – some of whom delivered the battle cry “Hojotoho” more proficiently than Deborah Voigt. Although strong in their individual contributions, the ladies produced beautifully-sung, deeply-textured ensembles and displayed a natural camaraderie onstage.

The Met Orchestra performed to its high standard of musicianship under the baton of Music Director James Levine. The musicians played masterfully in the powerful forte moments yet expressively in the subdued piano passages.

The final bows of "Die Walküre"

As stated earlier, the Lepage production has progressed significantly since the first installment of the cycle. Lepage’s direction of the performers was perfectly choreographed with the opera’s descriptive music and the performance rarely lagged. Although the stage machinery is still loud and quite distracting, the production uses the machine much more creatively. Unlike Das Rheingold, where the planks were used mainly as flat screens for interactive projections, in Die Walküre they were arranged into various configurations that emulated natural scenery – a heavily wooded forest, a rocky crag, a snow-topped mountain – and the projections served ably as textures for each environment.

In addition, during both Siegmund and Wotan’s narratives, images or animations were projected onto the set to bring the characters’ stories to life. These projections focused attention away from the Met’s built-in translation system and onto the stage, as well as enabling the audience to grasp the details of the intricate plot. Although some touches were campy –the Valkyries rode the planks as horses during the famous “Ride”, or the final scene having Brünnhilde suspended upside-down – the production team used the complex set effectively.

True "Ring Nuts" during an intermission of "Die Walküre" (photo courtesy of Jan Jobson Rowland)

I highly recommend this production of Die Walküre, which combines a stellar cast with a creative production concept. Performances run through the end of the season on May 14, with a “Live in HD” presentation of Die Walküre that afternoon. In addition, this production returns next season for the first presentation of the highly-anticipated full Robert Lepage Ring Cycle.

To learn about the music of Wagner’s Ring check out this very useful website:

http://www.rwagner.net/e-frame.html

For a mini site devoted to the Met’s presentation of the Ring Cycle, visit:

http://metoperafamily.org/metopera/broadcast/hd_events_template.aspx?id=12572

For videos of Die Walküre, see:

http://www.metoperafamily.org/metopera/broadcast/template.aspx?id=16210&prodpage

And for an extensive photo gallery, check out:

http://archives.metoperafamily.org/Imgs/Walkure1011.htm

For questions or comments, email me at cbrowner@taftschool.org

Advertisement

Posted on April 30, 2011, in The Metropolitan Opera. Bookmark the permalink. 15 Comments.

  1. Nice shout-out to harry potter!!!
    Your commentary on the actors appearance was quite comical (mad eye moody, 50′s sci-fi actress). all very specific and thus very funny descriptions.
    ~Wallis
    P.S. Nice Hats :D

  2. As to the slight wobble, I think she was still recovering a bit from her throat infection two days before. You cannot expect her to be 100% that soon after something like that. It will improve. Normally she’s much more suited to her character than Kaufmann is to his. I don’t think of him as a true heldentenor. I’ve been listening to the live audio stream of the premiere and wasn’t that much impressed with him. He tries to do everything lyrically, even if not asked for or required. Lacks real bite. He made some text mistakes. Struggles with the lower registers. Sometimes gets the pace out of the score. His looks and the hype about him sometimes seem to ‘blur’ objective listening. I don’t necessarily mean you. He just can’t do anything wrong, so it seems. Well, I don’t really agree, I’m afraid. He has to come up with better to convince me of his Siegmund. But I’m sure he’ll grow into it. We’ll see in a few years.

    • bentnailopera

      Ms. Westbroek was recovering from illness and I understand that. As for her racing through “O hehrstes Wunder!”, it lacked any musicality and was quite unacceptable. As for your comments on Jonas Kaufmann, I have learned never to judge a singer’s abilities based on performances heard over the internet.Before this performance I would have completely agreed with you on every aspect of his performances; it was not until I heard him live – in a role appropriate for his voice – that I understood the scope of his talent. And trust me, I could care less about his looks or all the hype. He was fantastic during this performance, and if you see this production live, I’d be curious to hear your thoughts on the entire cast.

      • With all due respect, I didn’t really get the impression you completely understood her condition. You could at least have made a mention of it, to be fair to such an exceptional singer. That’s the least that she deserves, I guess. There’s always a difference between live and recording. Except, to a certain extent (my previous comment) for Kaufmann, I enjoyed the rest of the cast enormously. Your assumed limitations for not hearing Kaufmann live would also apply to them, I think. Just logical thinking. I just listened to him very carefully, not just once. That’s because I downloaded the broadcast. I just happen to have a completely different opinion about him, no big deal. I could list some other things why I didn’t particularly like him. But I’ll better leave it at this. I do understand and get the message that you don’t make yourself too popular in the US saying anything negative about Jonas’ Siegmund. Even when you can list a number of reasons. Unfortunately.

      • bentnailopera

        I do agree that maybe I did not completely understand Ms. Westbroek’s condition and have mentioned it now in my post. But I was not making a judgment of her entire career or talent level; I was simply reviewing this single performance. As for Mr. Kaufmann, I am not afraid to criticize him or be unpopular doing so – as evident in my comment “[his voice] seemed out-of-place when he sang Cavaradossi in last season’s presentation of Puccini’s Tosca”. Again, this post serves only to discuss his contributions to this one performance, and during this one performance, he was excellent. I did not attend the opening night performance of which you speak, and none of my opinions stated in this post are related to that performance.

  3. have you seen il trovatore?

  4. It’s obvious you probably do not know too much of Miss Westbroek’s career, singing capabilities, or the ranking she currently has amongst the Sieglindes of all times, but I don’t blame you for that, of course. You just happen to judge her on a performance where she is recovering from a throat infection. In that case we can only say that it’s perhaps unfortunate you weren’t able to see the best of her (and unfortunate for her too, of course). As for Kaufmann, he wasn’t suffering from something when I heard him (as far as we know), so that shouldn’t have been the problem. But, who knows, perhaps I just picked out a kind of off-day on his part. It’s possible, of course. I’m just very curious to see how much he has improved, the 14th of may. It can probably only get better than what I’ve heard of him so far. I’m really looking forward to see it, Eva-Maria should be totally healthy as well. Unique, Live in HD :)

    • bentnailopera

      It is a shame that I could not see her at the best, but hopefully I can see the “Live in HD”when it’s rebroadcast on television. Hopefully you will enjoy Kaufmann’s performance as much as I did. Please let me know how it goes.

  5. I’ll let you know when I do feel he actually made me change my mind. Otherwise it’s probably not much use to repeat things, I guess.

  6. You’re welcome ! In fact I find that your blog is brilliant! :)

  1. Pingback: Ring Cycle for the 21st Century – “Siegfried” « The Bent Nail: A Teen Opera Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.